Apple asks the Supreme Court to reconsider a previous ruling in Epic’s favor

Must read

5 Types of Licenses for Financial Advisors

Financial advisors help individuals make informed decisions about their finances, but it’s also important to ensure that anyone you trust to manage your...

Legal Clash: Texas Crypto Firm Files Lawsuit Against US SEC Over Digital Asset Regulation

A Texas-based crypto company, Lejilex, along with the Crypto Freedom Alliance of Texas (CFAT), has filed a lawsuit against the US Securities and...

A Leading DeFi Bull Indicator? MetaMask Registers Over 30 Million In 5 Months

MetaMask monthly active users (MAUs) currently stand at over 30 million, a near 2X surge from around 19 million recorded in September 2023. ...

Bitcoin Bullish Signal: Inflows To HODLer Wallets Hit ATH

On-chain data shows the Bitcoin inflows going towards “accumulation wallets” have hit a new all-time high, a sign that could be bullish for...

Apple has asked the Supreme Court to reconsider a previous ruling in its fight against Epic Games that would change the rules of the App Store.

In a cert petition, filed Thursday and embedded below, Apple criticized a prior decision that would force it to allow app developers to point their users toward alternative payment options beyond the App Store. That injunction remains in limbo as Epic and Apple seek to elevate their ongoing battle to the high court, but would go into effect if the Supreme Court declines to take on the case.

Apple called the ruling that would force it to allow payment workarounds in its app marketplace “breathtakingly broad” because it would apply not just to Epic Games but to all app makers.

“In this single-plaintiff case, the district court sua sponte issued a universal injunction prohibiting petitioner Apple Inc. from enforcing one of its contractual guidelines against all developers of apps on the App Store’s United States storefront — of which there are millions — not just against respondent Epic Games, Inc,” the company wrote in the new petition obtained by TechCrunch.

“The Ninth Circuit affirmed on the ground that extending injunctive relief to some nonparties—approximately 100 other app developers—was necessary to redress Epic’s alleged injury. Neither court ever found, or even considered, whether relief as to all affected nonparties was necessary or appropriate.”

Epic filed its own petition to the Supreme Court on Wednesday, asking the high court to revisit its core allegation – that Apple violates federal antitrust laws with its lucrative App Store business. While the lower courts did side with Epic on the matter of promoting external payment options, the lion’s share of the ruling came down in Apple’s favor.

More articles

Latest article

5 Types of Licenses for Financial Advisors

Financial advisors help individuals make informed decisions about their finances, but it’s also important to ensure that anyone you trust to manage your...

Legal Clash: Texas Crypto Firm Files Lawsuit Against US SEC Over Digital Asset Regulation

A Texas-based crypto company, Lejilex, along with the Crypto Freedom Alliance of Texas (CFAT), has filed a lawsuit against the US Securities and...

A Leading DeFi Bull Indicator? MetaMask Registers Over 30 Million In 5 Months

MetaMask monthly active users (MAUs) currently stand at over 30 million, a near 2X surge from around 19 million recorded in September 2023. ...

Bitcoin Bullish Signal: Inflows To HODLer Wallets Hit ATH

On-chain data shows the Bitcoin inflows going towards “accumulation wallets” have hit a new all-time high, a sign that could be bullish for...

‘Avoid Ethereum (ETH) At All Costs’ Says Bitcoin Advocate – Here’s Why

Bitcoin supporter Fred Krueger has recently voiced concerns about Ethereum’s (ETH) fundamental trends and potential regulatory hurdles. Krueger’s remarks, shared in a post...