Stiffing the Staker: The SEC’s Latest Crackdown on Crypto Innovation

Must read

Stiffing the Staker: The SEC's Latest Crackdown on Crypto Innovation

The crypto world was jolted last week when the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) shut down Kraken’s staking program, much to the satisfaction of Chairman Gary Gensler and his team. But what does this mean for the future of cryptocurrency and, more specifically, staking?

The following opinion editorial was written by’s Business Development Manager Ben Friedman.

Balancing Regulation and Innovation in the Crypto World: Staking at the Crossroads

Staking, the act of retaining a specific amount of a particular cryptocurrency in a wallet and taking part in the validation of transactions on the network, is one of the most discussed topics in the digital asset world today. And for good reason. Staking has been promoted as the answer to several challenges facing the cryptocurrency ecosystem, including scalability, decentralization, and security.

But just as staking was beginning to gain momentum, the threat of overregulation rears its ugly head. The SEC’s recent action against staking services has once again spotlighted the issue of regulation versus innovation. While regulation is vital for stability and security, excessive regulation can hinder innovation and curb the potential for future growth.

It’s a tricky balance, but one that the SEC seems to have gotten wrong with their latest crackdown on Kraken’s staking program. This heavy-handed approach only serves to drive innovation offshore to less regulated regions, where these opportunities will be accessible. And who suffers the most from this? The American people are being deprived of the benefits of a thriving crypto ecosystem.

The truth is, staking is a vital piece in the puzzle of the future of the crypto world. The rewards of staking, such as increased security, decentralization, and profitability, make it an important tool for building a better, more secure, inclusive, and profitable crypto ecosystem. But overregulation threatens to disrupt all of that.

So, what can we do about it? Well, we can start by recognizing the importance of staking and speaking out against overregulation. We need to make our voices heard and let the powers that be know that staking is here to stay and an essential part of the future of the crypto world.

Don’t be discouraged by the SEC’s latest move. Get involved in staking and reap the rewards for yourself. And who knows, you might even help shape the future of crypto in the process. Staking with a centralized exchange (CEX) or custodial service may seem like the convenient choice, but why trust a CEX with your precious assets when you can be the master of your own assets with noncustodial solutions? That’s right, with wallets and staking pools, you can stake your ethereum (ETH) or other cryptocurrencies without relying on a custodial service or exchange.

No more entrusting a third party with the security of your assets – you’ll have ultimate control and ownership over your keys. And let’s not forget, staking with noncustodial solutions adds a touch of decentralization to the network, making it even more secure. So, why settle for a mediocre staking experience when you can be a key master and stake on your own terms? Make the switch to noncustodial staking and enjoy the control and security that comes with it.

For example, Verse Farms offers non-custodial yield farming and the security and ease of use of the Verse DEX that provides users with peace of mind. To start earning rewards, simply connect a noncustodial Web3 wallet to the DEX and deposit LP tokens into Verse Farms. More information can be found here.

What is your take on the SEC’s decision to shut down Kraken’s staking program and the ongoing debate between regulation and innovation in the crypto world? Do you think staking is here to stay and an essential part of the future of the crypto ecosystem, or will overregulation limit its potential? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.

Guest Author

This is an Op-ed article. The opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own. does not endorse nor support views, opinions or conclusions drawn in this post. is not responsible for or liable for any content, accuracy or quality within the Op-ed article. Readers should do their own due diligence before taking any actions related to the content. is not responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any information in this Op-ed article. To contribute to our Op-ed section send a suggestion to op-ed (at)

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

More articles

Latest article